Have you ever wondered how many people are crammed into Burnsville in Minnesota? Here is the answer:
Burnsville, Minnesota has a population density of 866.59 inhabitants per square kilometer (2244.36 / sq mi)
That means the whole population of 60,306 people are living within an area of 69.59 sq km (26.87 sq mi).
As a reference: New York City has a population density of 6918 inhabitants per square kilometer (17918 / sq mi), thanks to it’s population of 8,398,748 inhabitants within an area of 1214 sq km (468.73 sq mi).
Burnsville () is a city 15 miles (24 km) south of downtown Minneapolis in Dakota County in the State of Minnesota. The city lies on the south bank of the Minnesota River, upstream from its confluence with the Mississippi River. Burnsville and nearby suburbs form the southern portion of Minneapolis–Saint Paul, the fifteenth largest metropolitan area in the United States, with about 3.6 million residents. According to the 2010 census, the population is 60,306.Burnsville has many attractions, including its regional mall, Burnsville Center. The city is also a recreational attraction with Alimagnet Dog Park, a section of Murphy-Hanrehan Park Reserve and 310-foot (94 m) vertical ski peak Buck Hill. Minnesota River wildlife is protected by the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge.Originally a rural Irish farming community, Burnsville became the tenth largest city in Minnesota in the 2000 Census following the construction of Interstate 35. Currently the ninth largest suburb in the metro area and a bedroom community of both Minneapolis and Saint Paul, the city was fully built by the late 2000s. Burnsville’s downtown area is called Heart of the City with urban-style retail and condominiums. The Burnsville Transit Station serves as the hub and headquarters of the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority, providing regional bus service to five other suburbs.The name Burnsville is attributed to an early Irish settler and land owner, William Byrne. His surname was recorded as “Burns” and was never corrected.
Cities with a similar population density as Burnsville
Other cities that have a similar population density as Burnsville, Minnesota are:
- St. Helens, Oregon with a population density of 843 people per sq km (2,184 / sq mi).
- Stamford, Connecticut with a population density of 952 people per sq km (2,465 / sq mi).
- Owensboro, Kentucky with a population density of 1,021 people per sq km (2,644 / sq mi).
- Pampa, Texas with a population density of 771 people per sq km (1,995 / sq mi).
- Cathedral City, California with a population density of 867 people per sq km (2,245 / sq mi).
- Murfreesboro, Tennessee with a population density of 749 people per sq km (1,941 / sq mi).
- Ames, Iowa with a population density of 901 people per sq km (2,334 / sq mi).
- Atlantic City, New Jersey with a population density of 887 people per sq km (2,299 / sq mi).
- Storm Lake, Iowa with a population density of 738 people per sq km (1,912 / sq mi).
- Colorado Springs, Colorado with a population density of 820 people per sq km (2,125 / sq mi).
Cities with a similar population size as Burnsville
Here a list of cities that have a similar number of inhabitants like Burnsville, Minnesota:
- Palm Beach Gardens, Florida with a population of 53,778 people
- Victoria, Texas with a population of 62,592 people
- Lynwood, California with a population of 69,772 people
- Royal Oak, Michigan with a population of 57,236 people
- Rockville, Maryland with a population of 66,940 people
- Wyoming, Michigan with a population of 72,125 people
- Highland, California with a population of 53,014 people
- Lakewood, Ohio with a population of 52,131 people
- Idaho Falls, Idaho with a population of 56,813 people
- West Haven, Connecticut with a population of 55,564 people
Cities with a similar size as Burnsville
If you want to check which cities have a similar size as Burnsville, Minnesota, here you go:
- Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin with 86.29 square kilometers (86.29 sq mi), population: 35,626
- Norwich, Connecticut with 76.16 square kilometers (76.16 sq mi), population: 40,493
- Chelsea, Alabama with 58.15 square kilometers (58.15 sq mi), population: 10,183
- Richmond, Indiana with 62.57 square kilometers (62.57 sq mi), population: 36,812
- Ventura, California with 83.13 square kilometers (83.13 sq mi), population: 106,433
- Merced, California with 60.16 square kilometers (60.16 sq mi), population: 78,958
- Lathrop, California with 59.65 square kilometers (59.65 sq mi), population: 18,023
- Charleston, West Virginia with 84.54 square kilometers (84.54 sq mi), population: 49,138
- New Franklin, Ohio with 69.10 square kilometers (69.10 sq mi), population: 14,227
- Sumter, South Carolina with 69.15 square kilometers (69.15 sq mi), population: 40,524